IPT In Play Trading Scanner & Data Feed

Get IPT inplaytrading here http://www.inplaytrading.com?a=32176

The In Play Trading (IPT) subscription is a Livescore Data Feed for matches the Bf Bot Manager standard feed misses.

IPT fills many of the gaps in the BFBM livescores basically.

IPT offers new In-Play data and Pressure Index which allows you to use the IPT rule in BFBM to make new in-play bots.

As part of the subscription, you also get access to the browser based InPlay Scanner that gives you a great way to view in-play statistics for live matches. You can find the best action packed matches on a busy weekend easily with their filter system.

This video will show you how to setup IPT In Play Trading livescore data feed in the Bf Bot Manager automated betting software for Betfair

Get IPT inplaytrading here http://www.inplaytrading.com?a=32176

Get Bf Bot Manager here https://www.bfbotmanager.com/affiliate/364

The In Play Trading (IPT) subscription is a Livescore Data Feed for matches the Bf Bot Manager misses.

IPT fills the gap in the BFBM livescores

IPT offers new In-Play data and Pressure Index which allows you to use the IPT rule in BFBM to make new in-play bots.

IPT SETUP

  1. Register on the IPT website. http://www.inplaytrading.com?a=32176

  2. Make a payment to IPT for the subscription you want.

  3. Contact IPT via their contact form. Tell them your IPT Username and tell them you are using BFBM so that they give you permission for 2 connections to IPT. (Your BFBM and your browser.) (If you need more than 2 simultaneous connections, then you will need to purchase a 1-year subscription and ask them to increase your limit to your required level. The maximum is 4.)

  4. Enter your IPT username and password in the BFBM IPT form.

Other Options

5. In the MARKETS screen, you can add a column called “Inplaytrading Statistics”.

(Manual Betting or programmable into BFBM)

I use IPT’s data feed to get more livescore data on my Bf Bot Manager, but this subscription also comes with access to their “InPlayScanner” which can be accessed from an internet browser.

The IPT Scanner shows all the live in-play games that are on, and it makes it easy to rank matches in order of shots on target, shots off target, corners, dangerous attacks and so on. It also highlights statistics when they get to high levels. It also has three Pressure Indexes which are a combination of different stats such as shots on target + dangerous attacks, etc.

IPT In Play Trading Pressure Index is calculated as follows:

This information is direct from IPT. I asked them myself.

Pressure index 1 =

(number of shots on target + number of shots off target in last 10 minutes) x 10

+ 1 point for each 5% of possession In the last 10 minutes

(Highlighted red in browser scanner when home+ away PI1 combined is 70 or more)

Pressure index 2 =

Number of dangerous attacks in the last 10 minutes (1 point each)

+ 1 point to each team if there were no corners in the last 8 minutes. (+2 points to combined total)

(Highlighted blue in browser scanner when

A) home + away PI2 combined is 15 or more

OR

B) between 11-14, and has been at least 11 for the last 8 minutes.)

Pressure index 3 =

Number of dangerous attacks in the last 5 minutes (1 point each)

(Highlighted green in browser scanner when 10 or more)

I was looking for some good inplay opportunities, so I ranked the games by different factors, mainly the shots on target or dangerous attacks columns. I then placed bets in-play based on these two methods:

Back H Favs @0-0

Lay A Dogs@ 0-1

Back H Favs @0-0

If a pre-match favorite had a lot of shots and dangerous attacks, and it was still 0-0, preferably in the first half, but up to 60m was okay, then I would back the favorite to win a target profit of 100 GBP.

If that bet lost, I increased my stake size for the next opportunity, and kept going until I won 100 GBP profit on the trade session. Since it as in-play betting, I would follow the match and if it was still 0-0 with the odds getting higher but still with the home team dominating, then I would add on more stakes at 10 GBP each 5-10 minutes up to the 80m mark.

Lay A Dogs@ 0-1

If the 0-0 game I was backing the home team in then conceded a goal, I would double down on my position and place a large lay bet on the underdog so that a draw would also make 100 GBP profit, and a home win would make even more.

If I was not already betting in a game, and the underdog is up, then I would also enter matches laying the 0-1 dog to win a profit of 100 GBP.

After 60m, back another goal

For matches that have gone past 60m, instead of backing or laying the fav/dog, I would just place a bet on another goal being scored if the odds were above 1.5. That would be backing over 0.5 goals in a 0-0 game, or backing over 1.5 goals in a 0-1 game.

In all of these cases I am using the IPT scanner to find live games with a lot of attacking action and goal mouth pressure, and then place bets. If I lost, I increased stakes to recover losses and achieve my target in the next bet. It was quite emotional and loose betting. The only fixed rule was that I had 1k to play with and if I lost that I would give up on this gambling session. On this occasion I have been lucky and made a decent profit.

After I realised the month was not going to be a financial disaster, I started to make notes on the kind of matches I was going into and seeing if I could turn that into an automated bot that could plug away at lower stakes and show my long term if this kind of method can work for me.

The automated bots will have a trailing stop loss of the allotted bank. So if the bank is 500 GBP and it makes +1,000 profit but then goes on a losing run of -500 GBP, then the bot will stop at that point and I can see how much the bot made before it went on a bank destroying -500 run. The idea here is that I know the bot will hit an unusually long losing run at some point and reach -500. The question is, will there be enough profit from the winning cycles to counterbalance the losing cycles. So maybe a calmer, more data driven automated bot can come out of this kind of betting. My BFBM has the same inplay data feed that IPT Scanner does, so I should be able to automate it over time. But this inplay betting was very casual, emotional driven bets with quite a variety of qualifying matches, so it will take time to really separate the different qualifying criteria and make them into proper working bots.

The IPT Scanner has a Betfair page and a sportsbook page that includes other non-Betfair matches, too. So if there were not any good matches on Betfair, I could use the bookie scanner and then bet on Pinnacle/PS3838.

Betfair Scanner

Bookies Scanner

At the moment the IPT data feed and scanner costs £26 per month with a 6-month subscription.

If you ask them, you might get a cheaper 12-month subscription sometimes that gets the price down to near 20 GBP per month.

March 2025 Update

Is the IPT data feed still worth it for BFBM users?

Answer = Yes!

BFBM had an update a while ago that had even more in play statistics available as standard.

This raises the question, do we still need the IPT data feed to fill in the gaps for in play data?

I ran a test to see which feed had more in play data.

Out of 291 matches, IPT had in play data for 252 of those matches but the BFBM standard feed only had 221 matches.

So the IPT data feed still does cover more matches than the BFBM standard data feed.

(The tracker bot placed in play bets if the data feed showed 1 dangerous attack or more, which would be achieved by any match with an in play data feed.)

I mainly used it to fill the gaps of in play statistics that BFBM sometimes has.

I also run some bots that use their unique Pressure Indexes.

 

IPT’s in play data feed has 3 pressure indexes.

BFBM’s in play data feed has 2 pressure indexes. Their data feed comes from a company called SportMonks.

 

IPT In Play Trading Pressure Index is calculated as follows:

This information is direct from IPT. I asked them myself.

Pressure index 1 =

(number of shots on target + number of shots off target in last 10 minutes) x 10

+ 1 point for each 5% of possession In the last 10 minutes

 

(Highlighted red in browser scanner when home+ away PI1 combined is 70 or more)

Pressure index 2 =

Number of dangerous attacks in the last 10 minutes (1 point each)

+ 1 point to each team if there were no corners in the last 8 minutes. (+2 points to combined total)

 

(Highlighted blue in browser scanner when

A) home + away PI2 combined is 15 or more

OR

B) between 11-14, and has been at least 11 for the last 8 minutes.)

Pressure index 3 =

Number of dangerous attacks in the last 5 minutes (1 point each)

 

(Highlighted green in browser scanner when 10 or more)

 

When I asked BFBM how SportMonks’ Pressure Index is calculated, I got this answer.

Pressure Index 1 & 2: The pressure index values are calculated as below:

Pressure index 1 =

(number of shots on target + number of shots off target in last 10 minutes) x 10 + possession time / 5

Pressure index 2 =

number of dangerous attacks in last 10 minutes + 1 point to each team if there were no corners in the last 8 minutes.

But this seems similar to IPT and also it does not seem to match the description on the SportMonks website. But they assure me that the information is from a source close to SportMonks.

https://www.sportmonks.com/football-api/football-pressure-index/#:~:text=The%20Pressure%20Index%20is%20calculated,time%20has%20the%20opposite%20effect.

Which says:

“The Pressure Index is calculated using a combination of statistical factors that affect a team’s pressure level. Each statistic is weighted to reflect its relative importance. For instance, receiving a red card reduces the team’s pressure, while increasing possession time has the opposite effect. This ever-changing score accurately represents the intensity with which one team applies pressure to the other throughout the game.

The factors taken into account include:

Attacks

The offensive performance of a team, including the number of dangerous attacks, shots on target, shots off target and scoring opportunities.

Ball Possession

The amount of time a team spends in possession of the ball, indicates their control and dominance on the field.

Shots

The number of shots attempted by a team, reflecting their offensive intent and pressure on the opposing team’s defence.

And more!

And a plethora of other advanced statistics and insights to provide a comprehensive analysis of team performance and game dynamics!”

The attacks, ball possession and shots part matches the formula above, but I am not sure about the “red card” and “plethora of other advanced statistics”. Is that just marketing fluff?

 

When there is doubt, the best way is to just run some tests!

So I made some in-play bots with exactly the same Pressure Index settings but each using the BFBM or IPT data feed.

For each bot idea I made 3 bots

0x.1 BFBM data feed Pressure Index 1,2

0x.2 IPT data feed Pressure Index 1,2

0x.3 IPT data feed Pressure Index 1,2,3

 

In all the cases, IPT got triggered more than the BFBM feed.

Bot 1 2 BFBM vs 12 IPT matches

Bot 2 2 BFBM vs 11 IPT matches

Bot 3 2 BFBM vs 20 IPT matches

Bot 4 37 BFBM vs 41 IPT matches

Bot 5 35 BFBM vs 39 IPT matches

Bot 6 64 BFBM vs 73 IPT matches

My conclusion from this is that the two data feeds have different calculations for their pressure index.

They may even have different statistics for the same game. It depends on how they get their data.

If you are interested in in-play bots, then I would recommend running your ideas using both feeds in case your bot idea works better with one of them.

 

In the above bots, the bot that backs a goal after a cold period of little game action seemed to do the best. This is another Against the Trend style of bot where the market overbacks a certain outcome which pushes the other selections into value. That may be happening here or it might just be luck. I will leave the bots going to find out.

 

If you bought an IPT subscription through my link or if you are my BSG-BFBM Support Service subscriber, then I will give you these bots free if you email and request them.

If you do have an IPT subscription, don’t forget that you can also access their browser based tool that is good for getting ideas for inplay bets, either manual or turning them into bot settings.

 

They also send emails highlighting matches that they recommend total goals based bets on.

PreMatchTrading (PMT) service

 

InPlayTrading also have a PreMatchTrading service that I have not tried yet, but their software “uses prices in liquid markets and calculates relevant prices in secondary markets thus allowing users to spot mispriced events and profit from trading them before the game has started. PMT is a football markets model based on probability theory and statistics. It is used on the trading exchanges like Betfair/Betdaq.”

So it sounds like they are looking for value in secondary markets, kind of like how we found 4-5% value in the under 0.5 goals market for the BSG draws system event though the core trend was a 2% ROI in the Match Odds full time draw.

 

I need to fiddle with something on BFBM instead of my main Betaminic/BSG Draw bots, so I am having another go with IPT bots.

I have tried to make some of their recommended strategies (GoalWatch and ThreeLays) into BFBM bots but without much success.

Some other tests are showing green though. I will have to run SportMonks vs IPT tests.