Clarification on what my betting plan is

I know it was a bad weekend with a lot of losses, and after a few emails I realised I should make it absolutely clear what my betting plan is.

 

Whitaker NLC ELSx4 / 1,000 staking has a 17% chance of bankruptcy over the next 1,000 bets.

I use these settings knowing that there is a chance my bank will be bankrupted. It is a calculated risk.

Last weekend (April 5th/6th) that bankruptcy came for some people using my bots.

My aim is to make x5 on my bank. So there is a 83% chance that my bank will x5 and a 17% chance it will -1.

My plan is to repeat that cycle with a 2k bank several times and over the long term came out on top.

We have a very high volume of bets, and those betting cycles will be faster than those I had in the past with fewer bets.

 

My website and newsletters started as a betting diary and grew into a betting guide.

My site recommends the tools that have worked for me in the past.

Please view my systems as more of a personal betting diary. You can copy what I am doing if you want, but you do so at your own risk.

I enjoy my betting. I play with betting tools. I make a plan and watch it run.

I am not selling a system that guarantees profit. I am not a tipster. I am sharing what tools have worked for me and I am even sharing the strategies I am following to help you get started. The best thing is for you to learn how to use Betaminic and BFBM yourself. Then you are in full control of your betting system.

 

If you want a safer bot set that is not supposed to go bankrupt as part of the plan, then you could use Whitaker NLC ELSx10 / 10,000 staking. This decreases the stakes to about a 30% lower level than ELSx4/1,000 settings.

 

Whitaker NLC ELSx10 / 10,000 staking has a 1% chance of bankruptcy over the next 10,000 bets.

But it will reduce profit targets to about 30% of previous levels, and so needs a bigger bank to cover costs.

 

I get that 1% figure from my analysis of Betaminic strategies.

738 strategies out of 743 did not go bankrupt when used with Whitaker ELSx10. But 0.6% of strategies still did. That is where I get the chance of bankruptcy figure from.

 

If you want to go back to basics and try to reduce risk in your bot set.

Idea 1

You could switch from the full x34 set of strategies down to the x23 strategies I initially recommended.

Idea 2

Or even just use the x18 strategies Betaminic highlighted at the start of the year

https://www.betaminic.com/betting-strategies/the-best-betting-strategies-for-2025/

Idea 3

Stop using the BSG16 lay strategy, since that is a speculative method made by me and not officially encouraged by Betaminic.

(But I keep using it because I have other private lay strategies made with other users that are working, so I think lay strategies from Betaminic can work. And BSG16 is still in profit long term.)

Idea 4

Switch to Whitaker NLC ELSx10 / 10,000 staking.

Whitaker NLC ELSx10 / 10,000 staking has a 1% chance of bankruptcy over the next 10,000 bets.

But it will reduce profit targets to about 30% of previous levels, and so needs a bigger bank to cover costs.

 

This table below tries to summarise my current betting plan and its risks with my chosen strategies and staking plans. Please note the chances of bankruptcy compared to the long term profit targets.

I plan to do a full review of all the strategies I am using and see if they are okay as they are or if there are ways to update them, or if they need dropping. I will share the results of that review and try to show you how I do that deep review of the strategies in YouTube videos.

 

But the most important thing is to look at the data and the tools, and for you to make your own decisions about what strategies to follow, what staking plan to use and what risks you are willing to take with your bank.